show all
Thursday, September 2, 2010 | 23:08 Beirut Subscribe to NOW Lebanon RSS feeds
   
Who and why now?
Elie Fawaz , NOW Contributor , January 9, 2009

Despite the presence of 15,000 well-equipped UNIFIL peacekeepers in southern Lebanon in addition to 15,000 Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) troops, an unknown group suddenly decided on Thursday morning to launch rockets from the South into Israel.

The first questions to ask, of course, are, “by whom and why now?”
 
There are four groups in South Lebanon well armed enough to launch such attacks. Two of them, the LAF and UNIFIL, act in a peacekeeping capacity, with absolutely no history of deliberately and arbitrarily attacking Israel, making the chances it was either of them zero. That narrows it down.

The next candidate is Hezbollah — the Iranian-inspired “Party of God”— which has the full capacity to lob rockets against its southerly neighbor and has in the past. And then there are the various pro-Syrian Palestinian factions — in particular the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC), the primary suspect in Thursday’s rocket launching. The destructive powers of the group, headed by Ahmad Jibril, should not be underestimated.

But why launch such an attack now? Motive and opportunity.

First, Iran may want to open a new front against Israel via its proxies in South Lebanon to help rescue its beleaguered colleague Hamas and ease pressure on the group, especially given its less-than-stellar performance against the Israeli army in Gaza: To date, the IDF has not faced very fierce resistance in Gaza since launching its offensive on December 27. The number of Israelis killed and equipment destroyed in comparison to the size and scope of the operation has been minimal. Moreover, the fiery rhetoric on behalf of the Hamas leadership at the outset of the conflict has since proven little more than hot air.

Hezbollah, for its part, maintains similar violent rhetoric when it comes to the issue of Israel and similarly does not seem to have a problem inviting the Jewish State to engage in a war on Lebanese soil. Considering the widespread death and destruction happening in Gaza, the Lebanese should step back and ask whether the Party of God’s “divine right” to possess its own private arsenal – and use it – is appropriate and in the best interests of Lebanon.

Secondly, as it has in the past, Syria is vying to take the role of mediator in settling the conflict in Gaza, undoubtedly to accrue undue praise and use its diplomatic playing cards — one of which may well be Lebanon. The Assad regime’s powers of persuasion seemed to work on French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who, after his visit to Damascus on Wednesday, was convinced that “Syria can provide an important contribution to a ceasefire.” Whether that solution comes at the cost of Lebanon remains to be seen.

Given the mediating role in the Gaza crisis that Egypt is taking up, it should come as no surprise that Iran and Syria feel threatened and are looking for any excuse to trump their old enemy Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. Hamas has been making calls to include Syria in the Cairo-led peace negotiations, and Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah has urged the Egyptians to topple Mubarak’s regime.

With Syria and Iran’s desire for expansion, and given Thursday’s rocket launching from South Lebanon, the main worry for the Lebanese is the peacekeeping capacities of UNIFIL and the LAF. If a combined 30,000 troops are unable, or unwilling, to impose security in the South, where is Lebanon headed?

It is the duty today of the Lebanese government to step up, assert its sovereignty and authority and preserve the security of the people of all Lebanon — especially those in the South. Lebanon cannot allow another conflict to erupt with Israel based on the decisions of an unelected few, and it must do everything it can to avoid another costly human tragedy that may well send the country into the throes of a civil or regional war.

Rather than requesting outgoing American Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to stop US support for the massacres in Gaza, it would prove far more prudent for Lebanese leaders to prevent massacres from occurring here by stopping the country from once again becoming intractably involved in yet another unnecessary and destructive fight with Israel.

Elie Fawaz is a political analyst based in Beirut.

Bookmark this article:
Digg  Facebook Google StumbleUpon StumbleUpon Delicious
Comments ( 7 )
Posted by
sami
January 17. 2009
Fad, when one mentions elections it is obvious that he means those who have the right to elect or be elected, what does FPLP has to do with being elected?It is outside the electoral process and thus we should not take it into consideration when discussing the elected few.Jumail, Shamoon, Jajae, Carlos,Lahood are all not elected yet they are allowed to talk all they want.FPLP are not Lebanese they do not enter the circle of discussion, try another party.
Posted by
Hassan
January 10. 2009
Sami. I watched the video. It didn’t cure my illness; it made me sad knowing there are still people like you who believe this talk. All I saw in the video that he wants Guarantees from Israel that it will not take Lebanon as a dream of the promise land. Well, it can happen; Egypt and Jordan have guarantees. However, I want him to guarantee that my children in the future don’t have to learn the Persian language in the high schools. I want him to guarantees that he will not turn against me (again) in the streets. I want guarantees that he will respect my elected vice president as much as he respects the Khomeini, I want guarantees etc…. Sami. Who wants to talk about the year 1949? I saw hate and anger towards the past in this video. The whole idea is to forgive, forget and change. If you are telling me I should accept the armed Hezbollah because of the promise land, fine let’s talk religion not patriotism. Israel knows perfectly that time has changed and that Moses didn’t give them lega
Posted by
fad
January 9. 2009
sami unelected few wouldn't be referring to the FPLP? besides i remember the sayed saying that if he knew the scope of the damage israel would inflict on lebanon he would have not undertake such an endeavor. review the documents and please review your math while you are at it.
Posted by
sami
January 9. 2009
Fawaz, when someone warns his enemy that they would be hurt if they entered their land is a warning to stay out.If one wants to start war one attacks (as the case in 2006) not warns enemy not to attack.Logical?
Posted by
sami
January 9. 2009
Hassan, watch this link as to why HA will not disarm and get back with me in the morning, this will cure all your ills.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pfp6BTBfvaA
Posted by
sami
January 9. 2009
Fawaz,HA and Amal are not the unelected few(if you are referring to them, but who else would you mean).They represent more than 90% of the Shiaa population which consist of more than 40% of the Lebanese people and supported by the majority of the Maronites(the General).You do the math and tell us again what are the desires of the Lebanese people that you claim to represent here.The Sayyed did not invite Israel to engage in a war with Lebanon, please quote his words where he did, thats a challenge to your misinformation.He did say that they would be buried in our land if they entered it, that sounds like an invitation to stay away , doesn't it?
Posted by
Hassan
January 9. 2009
Very nice. However, the question should not be “by whom and why now?” The question should be “why do we allow any arm militia representing countries like Iran (Hezbollah) and Palestine (Hamas) etc. to be armed in our country, and using the south as tennis court to play their political games. Israel attacked, and will always attack any destructive party using the south to bomb shells. And the answer is simply there shouldn’t be any armed force in Lebanon except for the Lebanese army, period.
username or email
password