show all
Thursday, September 2, 2010 | 23:07 Beirut Subscribe to NOW Lebanon RSS feeds
   
Suicide
June 27, 2008

The battle is quietly being lost for the commanding heights overlooking Mt. Lebanon. The affiliation of the masked gunmen taking up residence in various strategic locations throughout the mountain range is not hard to imagine. Hezbollah’s encroachments into non-Shia areas is an alarming new development in a Lebanese situation that becomes more alarming by the day. The last we checked, there weren’t many Israeli outposts in the Metn, Jbeil or the Kesrouan, let alone in the Barouq, Niha and Aley.
 
Hezbollah has been placing a premium on being able to deploy its forces outside predominantly Shia areas of Lebanon. Last September, NOW Lebanon reported on the party’s land purchases and construction projects in Jbeil and Jezzine, and in March on its establishment of an effective “security perimeter” in the Abu Samra neighborhood of Tripoli. Much like its private communications network, Hezbollah’s military network has expanded throughout Lebanon in recent years.
 
The logic is clear: These are preparations for war, or rather preparations to ensure that if there is a war, Hezbollah’s adversaries won’t be able to fight one. The party knows better than to enter Christian, Druze or Sunni areas. So it has opted for control of the high ground – high ground overlooking the territories of its foes but also controlling lines of communication between mainly Shia areas in the northern Bekaa Valley, the southern Bekaa, South Lebanon, and Beirut’s southern suburbs. 
 
In that context we can better understand what happened in western Beirut last May. The military operation was a warning, namely that anyone who dared challenge Hezbollah would face armed attack. The strategy only partly worked, however. Hezbollah’s efforts to take over Hill 888 in Aley, which controls access to the entire area overlooking Beirut’s southern suburbs, and its efforts to take the Niha and Barouq high ground, which would have placed Walid Jumblatt and Mukhtara under its guns, failed. In Choueifat, as in the Chouf and Aley, the Druze united against Hezbollah. But that hardly means the party will not try again. If anything, Hezbollah is now familiar with how the Druze might react in the future.    
 
Hezbollah knows that the Shia are geographically vulnerable, but its actions are only ensuring that the community will be viewed as a menace by most other Lebanese. No one doubts that Hezbollah has the weapons and training to fight a hard fight, even win in many places. But what is taking place today has so transgressed the red lines of all communities that what we will almost certainly see in the near future is a dangerous logic of communal self-defense taking over. Just as the Druze united against Hezbollah, so too will the Christians and Sunnis. For the party’s strategy to be effective in the long term, it needs to have the capacity to occupy territory and hold it, not just control access routes.
 
But does it have such a capacity? Plainly no. If an all-out war breaks out, God forbid, Hezbollah will be on its own. Israel would be delighted, and may even show its delight by drawing a hard red line preventing Syria from deploying into Lebanon in support of Hezbollah. There would be a fine massacre, Hezbollah would see its power eaten up in a new Lebanese civil war, and the Lebanon we know could be lost for good as a Pandora’s Box of myriad evils is opened up. If that’s Hezbollah’s plan, then it’s a wonderful one: a wonderful formula for collective suicide.
 
We know Hezbollah doesn’t care. All other alternatives, the party realizes, would require it to eventually surrender its weapons, which would leave Hezbollah without a reason to exist. However, Hezbollah’s insistence on keeping its weapons will only prompt everyone else to arm, too. But if everybody is armed, then Hezbollah’s military advantage will slowly dissipate. So the party is pushing everybody into a strategy that is both suicidal and that is guaranteed to wipe away its military superiority.
 
It’s in moments like these that we wonder why Hezbollah is so often viewed as invincible. We’re pretty normal people, but we can already see a train wreck in the making, and whoever comes out of a train wreck in better shape? Hezbollah just can’t see the forest for the trees. Worse, it thinks it can destroy the forest and still proceed as if nothing happened. 

Bookmark this article:
Digg  Facebook Google StumbleUpon StumbleUpon Delicious
Comments ( 30 )
Posted by
Dahia
July 18. 2008
sami is running out of comments....LOL....LOL....
Posted by
sami
July 18. 2008
Lomh live Sameer.thank you Iran and thank you Syria, thank you Dr. Bashar.
Posted by
Dahia
July 16. 2008
Let's celebrate the return of the terrorist samir Kantar......
Posted by
Cedars
July 16. 2008
Sami, i want my kids and everyone else's kids to live in peace, having weapons with you terrorist will not give us peace. ""There should only be one army""
Posted by
sami
July 15. 2008
HA is negotiating to free our men, and Syria is negotiating to get back Golan.What are you defending Lebanon's enemy for?Israel calls for the Disarming of HA and calls them terrorists, you call them terrorists and call for them to disarm, hmmmm aren't you and Israel are one and the same?
Posted by
Dahia
July 15. 2008
Thank you cedars....You answer my questions.
Posted by
Cedars
July 15. 2008
Sámi, as long as hassan is negotiating with Israel to get the prisoners back why doesn't he finish the job and sign a peace treaty with Israel? Syria is doing it, it seems your terrorists the Hizeb in contact at all times with Israel, and you're calling us on Israel's side? I don't negotiate with Israel, your Hizeb does. Let's not forget 1701, includes 1559 and also includes no more weapons to cross the border from the terrorrist country syria.
Posted by
sami
July 14. 2008
New information to you, Dahia, Lebanon is in an armistice with Israel not peace.The 1701 has a cessation to violent acts but not a stop to the war on Lebanon.Comparing the Lebanese army to the Israeli one is not realistic since our army does not occupy other peoples land.If and when we sign a peace treaty with Israel then and only then it would be prudent to disarm all resistance.Meanwhile stop calling others terrorists since this is what Israel calls them, are you on Israel's side?
Posted by
Dahia
July 14. 2008
Sámi, did Israel disarm? It is like asking the Lebanese army to disarm. NO Lebanon is not at war, it is at war when the HA attack the enemies. Let us all join and NO ONE can attack us. By war, hatred, illegal weapons (used against innocent Lebanese), we will all lose, specially your terrorists the HA.
Posted by
sami
July 10. 2008
Dahia, tell me why should HA give up its arms in time of war, and tell me why are you and m14 calling for this?Lebanon is STILL at war with Israel, did Israel disarm or you only want HA to disarm so they can come in Lebanon any time and destroy it again.This call is tantamount to a call by the French government to the French Resistance to disarm while the German occupation still there.By just calling HA a terrorist you took sides and we know with who.
1 | 2 | 3 |
username or email
password