show all
Sunday, August 1, 2010 | 08:22 Beirut Subscribe to NOW Lebanon RSS feeds
   
Iran’s protests and the Lebanese Left
How the events in Iran show the Left’s dormancy
Tim Fitzsimons , NOW Staff , July 3, 2009
Iranian presidential candidate Mir-Hossein Mousavi at a rally in Tehran. (AFP)

Before Lebanon’s parliamentary elections were over, the world was already turning its attention from Beirut to Tehran, where the presidential campaign was wrapping up.  And as the unexpected post-election drama unfolded, ripples from Tehran spread across the globe, raising new questions about that country’s relations with the rest of the world, including Lebanon.

In a crackdown that echoed Pinochet and Tiananmen, the Iranian government went after those who had fomented or participated in the protests that followed what many have denounced as rigged elections.  It looked like the handiwork of Iran’s previous regime led by Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, and echoed an age when battles between leftist and the state spilled out into the streets.  The differing reactions drove a wedge between Iran’s close allies and its developing relationships, such as the United States, which sought to engage Tehran on its nuclear program.

Hassan Nasrallah, Secretary General of Lebanon’s Hezbollah – which receives financial and military aid from Iran – swiftly congratulated both President Ahmadinejad and Supreme Leader Khamenei, just as protests were getting underway. Some left-leaning Lebanese denounced the crackdown, but there was not as much of a vocal reaction here as there was in the rest of the world.

What the Lebanese reaction to the protests did show is that the Lebanese Left – the old guard of not only anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, anti-US activists, but also pro-worker and pro-women’s rights activists – is essentially dormant, having shifted from its old issues to the broader anti-Zionist push of Hezbollah and its allies.

Hazem al-Amine, the features editor at Al-Hayat newspaper, said the Iranian events showed that the Lebanese Left is today less interested in its former causes. “The Left, or whatever is left of it as the Communist Party, sees the issue of resisting Israel more important than the issue of democracy.”

However, leftists are not natural bedfellows of Hezbollah and the Islamic Republic of Iran. While both groups share anti-imperialist beliefs, they differ sharply on the matters of women’s rights, social issues and religion.

Political analyst Hazem Saghieh points out the troubled history of leftists in revolutionary Iran, where he said they have a “love/hate” relationship with the state, noting that once the Communist Party was repressed in Iran, and its leader, Noureddin Kianouri, was hanged by the Khomeini regime.

But he insisted that matters little to the Lebanese Left. “Regardless of [actions in] Iran and regardless of the attitudes of Hezbollah and Iran,” Saghieh told NOW Lebanon, “the Left would continue supporting Hezbollah because to the Left, Hezbollah is the Resistance… Its only concern is the situation of Iran in these strategic battles with America.”

However, Saghieh suggested that if political Islam were to lose some ground, “maybe the Left would try its luck” with another group.

Let’s change the subject

A Lebanese leftist who works with a non-government agency based in Beirut and who declined to be named due to her job obligations, said that the Western press’ obsession with the Iran protests betrayed its media bias against the regime, noting that much less air time was devoted to the Gaza War, which was much bloodier. “I’m sure everyone is with freedom of expression; I speak freely and I would like if it applies to everyone.  In Gaza, the media were not allowed to enter, and I didn’t see the media talking about freedom of expression [then].”

Amine suggested that the emphasis on other issues by leftists and pro-Resistance publications was self-serving. “As-Safir newspaper for instance, did not shed light at all on the regime hampering human rights, but on the contrary was supporting Ahmadinejad too, because they do support Hezbollah and would not like to highlight the threat of the Iranian regime’s downfall on Hezbollah.”

Ghassan Makarem, member of the steering committee of the Leftist Assembly for Change, part of the March 8 bloc, believes that the Left can support the Resistance and support the Iranian protesters simultaneously.  “We do support the Iranian protesters,” he said, but he suggested that leftists who support the Resistance “are not in support of Khamenei.”

“I think the Left should take a very clear position and not support Ahmadinejad,” Makaram said. “We know that Ahmadinejad has been attacking the student movement, he has banned the bus drivers from unionizing, he has used violence against people trying to call for change; that’s the same kind of change the Left is calling for.  But they should also support the fact that Iran has the right to its own sovereignty and the right to acquire nuclear energy. But for me I think it is two different issues: supporting the right of Iran and supporting the rights of the Iranians to do what they want.”

Bookmark this article:
Digg  Facebook Google StumbleUpon StumbleUpon Delicious
Comments ( 5 )
Posted by
Dawood
July 27. 2009
Most of Iranians are really fed up with local authorities and laws which are unbearable anymore. Below is the list of main restrictions enforced in Iran that may turn the life of average American into real nightmare: http://www.myhowtoos.com/en/red-hot/89-10-reasons-you-would-never-live-in-iran
Posted by
Mustapha
July 6. 2009
I second Voltaire. The "Left" in Lebanon cannot be painted in such a broad brush. Remeber, Walid Jumblat's PSP and Samir Kassir's Intellectuals are also to the "left", but hardly earned any mention. I wish Mr. Fitzsimons did a better job with his research. Mustapha @beirutspring
Posted by
Belfire
July 5. 2009
What a pathetic article. What a pathetic people. Can you not see that democracy and freedom and independence must never be abandoned in favour of the siren song diversions of fascist organisations like Hezbollah who would steal your democracy, your freedom and your independence? Israel is not your enemy. Hezbollah, Syria and Iran -- all of them fascists and totalitarian -- are your enemies. Grow up.
Posted by
john samford
July 5. 2009
What a Knee slapper!! The USA is the least Imperialistic nation on this earth. How many nations do we have to invade and then withdraw from before the 3rd world figures that out? Maybe it's a language problem and Imperialism doesn't mean what you think it does. Here is a clue. To be Imperialistic, one must have an Emperor. Hegemonic, Yes, Imperialistic, no. Nations with consensual governments practice some form of colonialism, but never Empire. Note that the first thing England did when they finally got a government stronger then the Monarchy was to start easing out of the Empire business and into Colonialism. Who wants the bother of an Empire when you can buy raw materials, turn them into consumer goods, sell them to the natives for more raw materials and a profit? As a native, which do you like better? Computers, air conditioning and big screen TV's or a tank driving down your street killing people and blowing stuff up? That is the way I would go too.
Posted by
voltaire
July 3. 2009
Some of the journalists above have not latched on to the current leftist scene in Lebanon. There are two main leftist blocs now. The old left, which Hazem al Amin describes (who rubbish democracy & r obsessed with a 'zionist conspiracy' & the so-called 'resistance'). Then there is the New left, which believes in a politics of social democracy (in which social welfare is combined with a respect for a democratic platform & humanist principles). I will also point out that the old left, & Hizbollah are not anti-imperialist. Yes, they r against US imperialism, but old left ignored Syrian junta enforced occupation of lebanon & its reign of corruption & terror, and Hizbola are a living product of the Khomeini imperialist legacy. As-Safir is no longer a socialist leftist journal.
username or email
password